Is waterless coolant any good

Is waterless coolant an alternative to antifreeze? What are the cons of waterless coolant? Does evans have waterless coolant?

Even when you purchase antifreeze for your vehicle, most manufacturers encourage you to cut the coolant in half with water. Any coolant option which contains water promotes overheating and may contribute to premature engine corrosion.

A waterless coolant that meets the ASTM standards can have up to 10-percent water and still retain its anti-corrosion properties. There are a few waterless coolant companies on the market, but only one.

The waterless coolant also is far better at corrosion prevention. Since there is no water there is no rust formation. The EVANS is non-conductive so there is also no chemical reaction caused by electrolysis between dis-similar metals. It is a lifetime coolant.

Although the product is a very good corrosion inhibitor, it will not adequately protect an engine when overheating. The engine will continue to run hot until a critical component fails as the boiling point is so high.

As the engine heated up and coole it automatically sucked the excess coolant back into the system, because as the coolant cools off, it drops in level, creating a slight suction on the system. Very true indee and for me personally the greatest obstacle to choosing a waterless coolant is the price. Any time Ive tried water wetter, it hasnt made a bit of difference. Pure water is the best coolant (Except for the Evans stuff of course).

Water has superior heat transfer capabilities but water’s low boiling point is close to the operating temperature of an engine, and water can cause corrosion. Evans is the only manufacturer of waterless antifreeze. That is actually one of their selling features. As rawze state the reason for pressuring the cooling system is to raise the waters boiling point in the coolant.

With waterless there is no water to boil and this stuffs good over something like 3degrees. The Evans Waterless may suit some engines but an expensive mistake if it goes wrong. Yet on a different page it mentions that it should only be used with a modified waterless coolant system.

Is this stuff any good ? Water content in many coolants in fact provides a single positive feature – it’s ultimately serves as a highly reliable heat conductor. However, coolants that contain water also provide various disadvantages such as having relatively lower boiling point. Came across waterless coolant used for cars in Wheelers Dealers show on discovery Turbo.

All things seem positive i. Was wondering if anyone here uses or has used any of the waterless coolants in their bikes.

My genwas running a litter hotter than usual in the good weather and thought I could drop the temperature a bit buy using a different coolant. Older cars often have non-pressurized cooling systems, and the coolant can boil and overflow. Traditionally, this issue has been solved by topping off the radiator with water. Waterless coolant is a glycol-based fluid that is ready to use, no water required.

This dilutes the coolant and the water can contain minerals harmful to the vehicle. When it comes to ensuring that your engine is in good condition, using an effective coolant will significantly help by regulating temperature throughout the engine.

They have higher boiling point but transfer less heat than water. Have a look at Silkolene pro CCA if this is something that might interest you. Try coolant less water. Deionised water from Halfords.

The higher the % water, the better the cooling ability. Best if its all water and no glycol.

Waterless Coolant Pros and Cons The traditional coolant used for keeping engines at their proper temperature contains 50% water. Make Big Savings Online With Euro Car Parts.

Hurry, Our Exclusive Discounts End Soon.